Bay Area Lyme Leading the Way Series
“Every one of our success stories amplifies the ripple effect of philanthropy done right: targeted, strategic, and driven by measurable impact.”
– Katariina Tuovinen
For more than a decade, Bay Area Lyme Foundation has been rewriting the story of Lyme and tick-borne disease research. With a mission to make Lyme disease easy to diagnose and simple to cure, the Foundation has built a national reputation as a nimble, entrepreneurial engine for scientific innovation. Since its founding in 2012, Bay Area Lyme has invested more than $31 million to support over 60 groundbreaking studies and partnerships across 56 institutions nationwide, each one helping to transform the landscape of Lyme disease diagnostics, treatments, and prevention.
At the heart of this success lies a small but mighty force: The Bay Area Lyme Science Committee, led by Research Grant Director Katariina Tuovinen, MS, MBA, MA, together with pediatric infectious disease physician Charlotte Mao, MD, MPH, and Liz Horn, PhD, MBI, Principal Investigator of Lyme Disease Biobank. Together, this team guides a grantmaking strategy that prizes bold ideas, cross-disciplinary collaboration, and measurable impact—an approach that has introduced new talent, fresh perspectives, and innovative technologies to a field that desperately needs them.





Dana Parish
Our Ticktective host, Dana Parish, interviews Dr. Neil Nathan, renowned physician and best-selling author. Dr. Nathan specializes in treating chronic illnesses, particularly those related to environmental toxins, vector-borne infections, and complex systemic disorders. With decades of experience in clinical practice, he focuses on understanding the impact of toxins on health and is dedicated to helping patients recover from illnesses that conventional medicine often struggles to address. His bestselling book, 


“I want to leave you with hope. I think we’re going to be unstoppable because I think that these are solvable problems. These are answerable questions. I think that there are already a lot of existing tools in immunology that just need to be brought into the fight, and we can change this.”
Any respectable pathogen that can establish a persistent infection needs to figure out your immune system to the point that it can evade it. The fact that it has persisted means that it was able to evade your immune clearance. And so, I got to that from a very interesting direction working on immune regulation, trying to understand these brakes on the immune response and how they impact the response to infection. The immune system has the power to kill you and obviously, nobody has any incentive for that to happen. So, there are a lot of mechanisms in place to put brakes on the immune system and reign it in. One of the huge developments in cancer over the last two decades has been reevaluating the question: can we take those brakes off? So in my postdoc, I was studying a particular checkpoint where this was turning into an exciting immuno-oncology target, and I said, ‘I want to look at how this checkpoint is used in infection.’ I realized that this checkpoint was being used to help you survive an acute infection, but created a vulnerability for pathogens to evade immune clearance and establish chronic infection much like it allows cancer cells to evade immune clearance. In an amazing collaboration with Irv Weissman, Balyn Zaro, and Jenifer Coburn we realized that the bacteria that cause Lyme disease manipulate this brake and that’s how I became fascinated with Lyme. But I also became concerned about turning off this brake in cancer patients because I was concerned about what would happen if you used this on cancer patients during an active infection. Indeed, the 